Current:Home > StocksThe White House is cracking down on overdraft fees -Dynamic Money Growth
The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
View
Date:2025-04-14 23:32:33
NEW YORK (AP) — The Biden administration has finalized a rule limiting overdraft fees banks can charge, as part of the White House’s campaign to reduce junk fees that hit consumers on everyday purchases, including banking services. President Joe Biden had called the fees, which can be as high as $35, “exploitative,” while the banking industry has lobbied extensively to keep the existing fee structures in place.
Under the finalized rule, banks will be able to choose from three options: they may charge a flat overdraft fee of $5, they may charge a fee that covers their costs and losses, or they may charge any fee so long as they disclose the terms of the overdraft loan the way they would for any other loan, typically expressed as an annual percentage rate, or APR.
While banks have cut back on overdraft fees in the past decade, the nation’s biggest banks still take in roughly $8 billion in the charges every year, according to data from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and bank public records. Currently, there is no cap on the overdraft fees that banks can legally charge.
Right now, when a bank temporarily lends a consumer money when their account has reached a zero balance, the consumer is typically responsible for paying back both the overdrawn amount and an additional fee, which can be more than the original amount charged. In one example often cited by opponents of the fees, a $3 cup of coffee can end up costing someone more than $30.
The finalized rule is set to take effect in October 2025, but the incoming Trump administration has yet to tap anyone to lead the CFPB, and has mentioned the idea of eliminating the agency.
The finalized rule applies to banks and credit unions that have more than $10 billion in assets, which includes the nation’s largest banks. Banks have previously sued the CFPB over these rules and caps on credit card late fees, and are likely to sue again. Congress also has the ability to challenge or overturn the rule.
Overdraft fees originated during a time when consumers wrote and cashed checks more frequently — so that the checks would clear instead of bouncing, if there was an issue of timing — but banks steadily increased the fees in the first two decades of the 2000s. The fees disproportionately affect banks’ most cash-strapped consumers. A majority of overdrafts (70%) are charged to customers with average account balances between $237 and $439, according to the CFPB.
The agency estimates the new rule would save consumers about $5 billion in annual overdraft fees, or $225 per household that typically experiences the fees.
_____
The Associated Press receives support from Charles Schwab Foundation for educational and explanatory reporting to improve financial literacy. The independent foundation is separate from Charles Schwab and Co. Inc. The AP is solely responsible for its journalism.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (1781)
Related
- Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
- Biden Has Promised to Kill the Keystone XL Pipeline. Activists Hope He’ll Nix Dakota Access, Too
- Biden's offshore wind plan could create thousands of jobs, but challenges remain
- On California’s Coast, Black Abalone, Already Vulnerable to Climate Change, are Increasingly Threatened by Wildfire
- 'We're reborn!' Gazans express joy at returning home to north
- The U.S. economy ended 2022 on a high note. This year is looking different
- Marc Anthony and Wife Nadia Ferreira Welcome First Baby Together Just in Time for Father's Day
- Here’s Why Issa Rae Says Barbie Will Be More Meaningful Than You Think
- 2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
- The U.S. economy ended 2022 on a high note. This year is looking different
Ranking
- Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
- Migration could prevent a looming population crisis. But there are catches
- Hong Kong bans CBD, a move that forces businesses to shut down or revamp
- Can you drink too much water? Here's what experts say
- Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
- Sarah Jessica Parker Breaks Silence on Kim Cattrall's “Sentimental” And Just Like That Cameo
- Thom Browne's win against Adidas is also one for independent designers, he says
- A Plea to Make Widespread Environmental Damage an International Crime Takes Center Stage at The Hague
Recommendation
Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
Taylor Swift and Gigi Hadid Prove Their Friendship Never Goes Out of Style in NYC
Is a New Below Deck Sailing Yacht Boatmance Brewing? See Chase Make His First Move on Ileisha
FBI Director Chris Wray defends agents, bureau in hearing before House GOP critics
Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
Warming Trends: Penguins in Trouble, More About the Dead Zone and Does Your Building Hold Climate Secrets?
Inside Clean Energy: Unpacking California’s Controversial New Rooftop Solar Proposal
America, we have a problem. People aren't feeling engaged with their work